<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TradeLens on Blockchaining.org</title>
    <link>https://blockchaining.org/tags/tradelens/</link>
    <description>Recent content in TradeLens on Blockchaining.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blockchaining.org/tags/tradelens/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Blockchain in Trade Finance: Where Enterprise Adoption Actually Landed</title>
      <link>https://blockchaining.org/2026/03/26/blockchain-in-trade-finance-where-enterprise-adoption-actually-landed/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blockchaining.org/2026/03/26/blockchain-in-trade-finance-where-enterprise-adoption-actually-landed/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The history of enterprise blockchain in trade finance is a useful corrective to the cycles of enthusiasm and dismissal that characterize coverage of distributed ledger technology. Neither the enthusiasts who projected that blockchain would eliminate trade finance friction within five years nor the skeptics who declared enterprise blockchain categorically pointless have been vindicated. What happened was messier, slower, and more instructive than either camp anticipated.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The high-profile failures are well documented. IBM and Maersk&amp;rsquo;s TradeLens platform — the most ambitious attempt to put global shipping documentation on a blockchain — shut down in 2022 after failing to achieve the network effects that made it valuable. We.Trade, a European trade finance platform backed by major banks, went into administration in 2022 as well. Marco Polo, another bank-backed network, faced similar difficulties.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
